Thursday, December 27, 2012

General Norman Schwarzkopf

General Norman Schwarzkopf
Retired Gen. H. Norman Schwarzkopf, who topped an illustrious military career by commanding the U.S.-led international coalition that drove Saddam Hussein's forces out of Kuwait in 1991, during George Bush's presidency. After that victory, he kept a low public profile due to the media attacks on all military heros fueled by the democratic party, died December 27, 2012. He was 78.

Schwarzkopf died in Tampa, Florida, where he had lived in retirement.

A much-decorated combat soldier in Vietnam, Schwarzkopf was known popularly as "Stormin' Norman" for a notoriously explosive temper.
He served in his last military assignment in Tampa as commander-in-chief of U.S. Central Command, the headquarters responsible for U.S. military and security concerns in nearly 20 countries from the eastern Mediterranean and Africa to Pakistan.

Schwarzkopf became "CINC-Centcom" in 1988 and when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait three years later to punish it for allegedly stealing Iraqi oil reserves, he commanded Operation Desert Storm, the coalition of some 30 countries organized by then-President George H.W. Bush that succeeded in driving the Iraqis out.

At the peak of his postwar national celebrity, Schwarzkopf -- a self-proclaimed political independent -- rejected suggestions that he run for office, and remained far more private than other generals, although he did serve briefly as a military commentator for NBC.

While focused primarily in his later years on charitable enterprises, he campaigned for President George W. Bush in 2000. 

 Initially Schwarzkopf had endorsed the Iraq invasion, saying he was convinced that former Secretary of State Colin Powell had given the United Nations powerful evidence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. After that seemed to be proven false, he said decisions to go to war should depend on what U.N. weapons inspectors found.

"In the final analysis I think we are behind schedule. ... I don't think we counted on it turning into jihad (holy war)," he said in an NBC interview.
Schwarzkopf was born Aug. 24, 1934, in Trenton, New Jersey, where his father, Col. H. Norman Schwarzkopf Jr., founder and commander of the New Jersey State Police, was then leading the investigation of the Lindbergh kidnap case, which ended with the arrest and 1936 execution of German-born carpenter Richard Hauptmann for stealing and murdering the famed aviator's infant son.

The elder Schwarzkopf was named Herbert, but when the son was asked what his "H" stood for, he would reply, "H." Although reputed to be short-tempered with aides and subordinates, he was a friendly, talkative and even jovial figure who didn't like "Stormin' Norman" and preferred to be known as "the Bear," a sobriquet given him by troops.

He also was outspoken at times, including when he described Gen. William Westmoreland, the U.S. commander in Vietnam, as "a horse's ass" in an Associated Press interview.

As a teenager Norman accompanied his father to Iran, where the elder Schwarzkopf trained the country's national police force and was an adviser to Reza Pahlavi, the young Shah of Iran.

Young Norman studied there and in Switzerland, Germany and Italy, then followed in his father's footsteps to West Point, graduating in 1956 with an engineering degree. After stints in the U.S. and abroad, he earned a master's degree in engineering at the University of Southern California and later taught missile engineering at West Point.

In 1966 he volunteered for Vietnam and served two tours, first as a U.S. adviser to South Vietnamese paratroops and later as a battalion commander in the U.S. Army's Americal Division. He earned three Silver Stars for valor -- including one for saving troops from a minefield -- plus a Bronze Star, a Purple Heart and three Distinguished Service Medals.

While many career officers left military service embittered by Vietnam, Schwarzkopf was among those who opted to stay and help rebuild the tattered Army into a potent, modernized all-volunteer force.

After Saddam invaded Kuwait in August 1990, Schwarzkopf played a key diplomatic role by helping to persuade Saudi Arabia's King Fahd to allow U.S. and other foreign troops to deploy on Saudi territory as a staging area for the war to come.

On Jan. 17, 1991, a five-month buildup called Desert Shield became Operation Desert Storm as allied aircraft attacked Iraqi bases and Baghdad government facilities. The six-week aerial campaign climaxed with a massive ground offensive on Feb. 24-28, routing the Iraqis from Kuwait in 100 hours before U.S. officials called a halt.

Schwarzkopf said afterward he agreed with Bush's decision to stop the war rather than drive to Baghdad to capture Saddam, as his mission had been only to oust the Iraqis from Kuwait.

But in a desert tent meeting with vanquished Iraqi generals, he allowed a key concession on Iraq's use of helicopters, which later backfired by enabling Saddam to crack down more easily on rebellious Shiites and Kurds.

While he later avoided the public second-guessing by academics and think tank experts over the ambiguous outcome of Gulf War I and its impact on Gulf War II, he told the Washington Post in 2003, "You can't help but... with 20/20 hindsight, go back and say, `Look, had we done something different, we probably wouldn't be facing what we are facing today."'

After retiring from the Army in 1992, Schwarzkopf wrote a best-selling autobiography, "It Doesn't Take A Hero." Of his Gulf war role, he said, "I like to say I'm not a hero. I was lucky enough to lead a very successful war." He was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II and honored with decorations from France, Britain, Belgium, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Bahrain.

Schwarzkopf was a national spokesman for prostate cancer awareness and for Recovery of the Grizzly Bear, served on the Nature Conservancy board of governors and was active in various charities for chronically ill children.

"I may have made my reputation as a general in the Army and I'm very proud of that," he once told the AP. "But I've always felt that I was more than one-dimensional. I'd like to think I'm a caring human being. ... It's nice to feel that you have a purpose."

Schwarzkopf and his wife, Brenda, had three children: Cynthia, Jessica and Christian.

Monday, December 17, 2012

Racist; Democrats or Republicans?

The Freedom Examiner is a compilation of writers who wish to express their own views that lay outside of the main stream. That is not to say that we don't agree with many issues that are presented by the media, but there are so many times these days when the news puts a slant on a story that is totally inaccurate or fuel charged in effort to get people charged up and angry. The discerning minded will not be part of the crowd all the time and in some cases, will never totally run with the group. Especially, with politics.

Personally, I learned to think more conservatively after spending time in Cuba and parts of Europe that were socialist. I thoroughly learned through experience that what the liberals are trying to do is bad for ALL American citizens. I also learned that in democratic states liberals hate conservatives with a mindless fanaticism that actually led me to never admit any of my conservative views because I just knew I would be called a lot of names that had nothing to do with my view points. Such as wanting low taxes, being allowed to carry weapons for protection, and for appreciating freedom to succeed. 

The typical liberal won't directly address those pretty typical conservative issues, instead they call us racist, when in fact our party was the anti slavery party that stopped black people from being treated as second class citizens, and talk a lot of nonsense that have nothing to do with what is really happening.

I decided that the liberal propaganda was so out of control that I began to speak about issues much to the surprise of many of my friends, that were not in line with liberal propaganda.  They were liberals and were therefore taught by MSNBC,  CNN or some other liberal media, that we are racist, and that is basically all its about.  The problem for my friends is they know I am not racist because they have been with me under every circumstance possible and they know without a doubt that I am anything but a racist. But they were so sure that being conservative means racism, that they had trouble being open minded towards something that they had been hit on the head with for so long.  After explaining that they have been duped into believing this by all the constant badgering by liberal shills, I proved it to them through introducing them to conservatives of all races and even taking them to a tea party, which they were surprised to discover was not even republican, but a mix of all political parties and all races. MSNBC and CNN deliberately only film the white people and will hunt out anyone who appears mad or intoxicated to display to their viewers as white racist and hateful people.

My friends have learned to at least question the way the main stream media presents republicans, and one girl in particular even said that she is starting to see that republicans are unfairly represented on television in every way. 

Had I never come out and talked about things, these people would not have seen the truth.  I endure abuse from angry liberals because I believe its worth it when at least one liberal learns that being republican means to have a passion for freedom, not a desire to act the way the democrats did in the 1860's and have black people picking cotton again.

Who is racist, Republicans or Democrats?

Clearly the democrats are racist if we have to choose one.  I do not even have to go back to the 1800s to come to this conclusion. I just received a name calling, and very ignorant email from a liberal today who called a writer here at The Freedom Examiner a racist because he wrote an article stating outrage over Obama politicizing the Connecticut shooting. 

This writer signed himself as "anonymous" of course. But in his writing it was clear that he misunderstood the article, believing that it said, "this shooting is Obama's fault." 

When a group of people are so blind as to freak out when they read something negative about "their guy" , we are in real trouble. One of the ironic things in the email was that it accused Mario De La Huerta to be a white racist, when he is Mexican and has African American relatives. Wrong again liberal!

One of my favorite things about the display of mindlessness was that he stood on a high horse saying that speaking in a critical way is "hateful" and "disgusting to say about a president." 

Although he signed himself anonymous, he used the same language on the Independent Politics Post blog a few minutes later and left a link to his blog which was a collage of curse words about George Bush and aggressive hate speech about Mitt Romney. Nothing that had any truth tied to it, just a bunch of name calling filth. His high horse about saying anything negative about a president went out the window when George Bush's name was linked to a string of racist and hateful curse words, and nothing more.

Again, many liberals have swallowed the Kool Aid without thought. They have been trained to shout, "Racist" at anything that upsets their agenda. Its not only wrong, and racist itself, but it takes meaning away from real racism. Come on Obama supporters, Lay off the Kool Aid and open your mind!


Obama Politicizes Connecticut Tragedy

President Obama has sunk to what many believe is a new all time low by politicizing the Connecticut Shooting. In one of the rare times that Obama, the most vacationed president, actually cancelled one of his trips to attend the memorial in Connecticut to "express his sorrow for those suffering" after the fatal mass shotting of 26 people.  But wait! Since when has the president shown real concern for people? 

Did Obama's Tears Look Real?

The American's who died in Libya were brushed under the rug while Obama campaigned and danced on televisions shows, laughing it up while American heros were put to rest. "I can't help feeling that when the Connecticut tragedy happened the president said, "Oh good! Now I can prove I am human and at the same time demand gun control," an unidentified woman at the memorial said.

The democratic party has long since been pushing for gun control, while Americans have stated we have always had the right to protect ourselves in this country and socialist and dictator driven countries do not have the right to own guns. This is the way it has always been, and taking guns away from citizens is not going to stop violence. Americans have sighted that workers in convenience stores are murdered every year, and the ones who survive are the ones who pulled a gun from behind the register. During these times of high emotion the extreme left are saying, "who cares about those workers, they are adults, and these were children who were killed." The liberals have neglected to see the whole picture. Those adults who are either killed in a late night convenience store or have defended themselves and survived can easily be the parent of at least one child.

As our world gets more violent, the innocent need more ways to defend themselves, not the other way around. Disarming law abiding citizens to control criminals is simply adding fuel to the fire.

The Independent Politics Post had something to say about this issue after Obama made his speech hours after hearing about the incident. Those who have worked alongside Obama in politics and even in college have said he shows little emotion in anything he does. He was described in a positive way by democrats during his first campaign for the white house as someone who seems like a robot. He had goals and went after them and no one really felt that they knew him personally because he was so "politics only." This impressed the democrats and they said that this is reason to vote for him. Now, however, the liberals have painted a picture of Obama's presidential opponent Mitt Romney, as someone who is all business and the 2012 election was 80% all about how Obama is the more emotional one. During the campaign Obama did do what he could to appear more human and basically ran differently than he had the first time, but now that he has taken the election, why would he be crying phoney tears?

Because had he said "that's it, we need to ban guns", people would have accused him of politicizing the tragedy to do what he has wanted to do all along- Disarm America! If he acts emotional, people will more easily listen to him out of believing he is reacting as a distraught parent as anyone else would.

Say what you want about democrats and Obama, but one thing is for sure. They have their agenda figured out. Every move is strategically planned, making the Obama white house the most corrupt administration America has ever seen.

Hold on to your guns. In case we are in serious trouble, you will need to protect your family rather than be taken hostage or shot down as in countries that have turned from freedom to communism over night.

  Writer- Mario De La Huerta

Saturday, November 3, 2012

Obama vs Romney Second Debate Polls

After being decisively clobbered in their first debate Obama has been clearly coached to be aggressive at all costs in this debate. When Romney and Obama squared off on October 3, 2012 Mitt Romney looked Obama in the eye, looked comfortable and answered all questions thoroughly while Obama looked down many times and even looked in the opposite direction of Romney. He made attempts at putting words in the governors mouth, by saying "his plan is to raise taxes on the middle class." The type of rhetoric that has helped keep people to dislike romney for fear that he will tell them that women can't work anymore, or that due to he being rich, he will want to hurt the middle class.
Romney debunked the most blatant lies in a matter of minutes early in the first debate and Obama was visible angered by the Govner's assertivness.
Even the most flaming liberal stations and their toadies were admitting that Romney won the debate.
Next Paul Ryan met Vice Presient Joe Biden for their debate that will probably go down in history as the most bizarre attitude in vice presidential history. Biden was rarely, if ever honest in his exchange with Ryan, and even accused Ryan of being dishonest. All the while he wore a prop smile on his face, and interrupted often. Biden was so aggressive that he even bullied the liberal moderator who lost control of the debate.
Who actually won was a toss up. Some belived that Ryan had the facts and therefore he won, while others stated that Biden won because he was so aggressive and domineering.


Writer- Monique Vargas

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Obama Lied, People Died

To vote for Obama is to vote against the American people. 

The biggest white house scandal of all time is unfolding right now, and the main stream media is ignoring it.

Both CNN and MSNBC, among others, have backed Obama for more than four years and coming out with the facts about the Obama administration at this point would make all of them look foolish, and as a result, they are talking about nonsense and ignoring Benghazi, which makes them part of the white house scandal and the shady cover up. 

 This massive coverup  starts at the white house and extends through the media. ABC News is ignoring emails regarding the Libya scandal, while CNN is trying to spread a fear that some politicians may believe that everyone should be responsible for their own birth control. Meanwhile the families of the dead are left with questions.

On September 11, 2012 the American Embassy was attacked by terrorists. The white house was watching the entire scenario unfold in real time. The Navy Seals who were on the ground at the time of the uprising asked the the white house for orders to go in and protect, and were told to "stand down". This scenario was repeated three times when finally the Seals decided to ignore the orders and to ahead with a rescue attempt. Sadly the lives of Tyrone Woods, Glen Doherty, and Sean Smith along with Ambassador Stevens were all lost.

 Charles Woods, father of Tyrone Woods, has come out to tell the story of his son the Navy Seal who was killed in Libya. Charles spoke to President Obama and Hilary Clinton when his sons body was brought back. Obama said I am sorry in a quick and cold manner that did nothing to put the family at rest.  Mr. Woods could also tell that president Obama was agitated by the whole situation as well as Hilary Clinton. Hilary actually said that "we are going to arrest the person who made that film." Charles knew that this was a lie. He knew this tragedy was not the result of a video and he knew that his sons death was the result of the men rioting in Libya, not the result of an American playing with a camera.
Obama Picture & American flag being burned in Afganistan

Charles later discovered that the president watched his son being murdered in real time and did nothing. The heroic efforts of his son along with the fact that he was an honest man, puts Charles at ease today. But, he will always have disgust for the pettiness of the Obama administration, and their coldness toward the heroic Navy Seals.

After immediately telling the American public that this attack on the American Embassy and the deaths of four Americans was the result of someone making a silly anti Muslim film and posting it to youtube, the Obama administration looks pretty fishy. Yet, they are not being pressed to tell the truth.

On October 27th President Obama declined to answer directly whether a CIA annex was denied urgent requests for military assistance during the deadly attacks last month on U.S. outposts in Libya.

Why did Obama lie? 

The economy has not really budged  since Obama has taken office, and gas prices are at an all time high. Before Obama was elected president, he said that he would get the economy thriving and decrease gas prices. Having failed at both of these major points, Obama was planning on running his campaign for a second term on telling the American public that there have been no terrorist attacks since he has been in office. This is believed to be why he threw four Americans under the bus. He wanted to get re-elected at all costs.

The terrorism and anti Americanism world wide has not changed and never will. America needs to feel comfortable with just being America and stop trying to gain the affection of the whole world.

Libya 9-11-2012

 The photo on the right shows Benghazi at the height of the attack. Ambassador Stevens died of smoke inhalation, and Tyrone woods was found slumped over his his gun. He fired his weapon in an effort to save the lives of Americans who were being attacked and was murdered while bravely standing at his post.

The Obama campaign did not let up. The president has been seen on a number of talk shows gracing over the terrorist attack and talking about light hearted issues.

This is how he was elected the first time. Talking about music, dance moves and fun things that encourage people to like him. The families of the dead are not laughing along with the president. They want to face the truth, and they want this white house to come clean regardless of the campaign.

Obama on a talk show weeks after the terrorist attack.

Great political articles: Left to Right, My Battle with Acute Liberalism


                      The Mitt Romney They Don't Want You to Know About

                                   Why Not Tax the Rich & Redistribute Wealth 

Writer-Mario De La Huerta

Friday, October 19, 2012

Time to Boycott NBC News for Blatant Distortion of Facts On Zimmerman Case

I think that a News program or channel should be just that; News. I don't mean that there should be no fluff, as I realize the light presentations that often accompany the serious news are what keeps people interested. I do not, however, condone false news just for the sensationalism of it. Especially when someones freedom and right to a fair trial are at stake. This is why I am boycotting NBC News. 

When I first heard about the Zimmerman/Martin case I was disgusted with Zimmerman for hunting down an innocent looking kid and shooting him. As facts have been emerging over the past several weeks we have learned that Treyvon Martin was not just a kid walking, but a troubled youth who when confronted by Zimmerman, attached him. I have been questioned in my mother's gated community security guard. I just simply respond to the questions and move on. Does it feel a little intimidating? Yes. Is it a little insulting? Yes. But I realize that it is a gated community and that is what the guard is being paid to do. We also have seen the photo NBC was showing of Treyvon, is appears to be the most sweet, and innocent looking one in existence of this youth.

My point being that if they were presenting facts, they should use a typical photo that resembles the real kid, they obviously went out of their way to present this as an attack on an innocent victim. The final straw for me was when I heard the un cut tape of the real scenario. NBC had edited the recording so that Zimmerman seemed to be saying, he looks suspicious, he looks black. Actually, Zimmerman said, he looks suspicious because of the way he is darting around, after the 911 operator asked what the race was, Zimmerman responded, "he looks black."

 A far cry from the facts. Now the crazies are all coming
out and trying to use the case to their advantage. Zimmerman does not stand to get a fair trial. The black panthers, also known as the black KKK, are asking for Zimmerman's head. At this time we are hearing some facts, and a lot of distorted, emotional feelings that do not really have a place in the real trial. NBC has been Irresponsible considering there is a bounty on Zimmerman, and they have deliberately started a racial disturbance for the sake of sensationalism.

Treyvon Martin
 I don't believe that they have any place in risking the life of Zimmerman for their ratings. They are also guilty of doing the same thing decades ago with the Rodney King trial and again the OJ Simpson case. Justice can not accurately be served when there are so many distortions being presented in our own living rooms. 

I want the facts, because based on the truth, I will have an opinion, and I think that if I were a security guard and felt as though I needed to do my job, and in the process a young guy like Treyvon started to beat me, I would see my life, and the lives of my loved ones flashing before me, and I would shoot him too. I think when common sense is included in the equation, the facts are clear. Does anyone truly think that they, in Zimmerman's position, would just take the beating, hoping to survive it; and further hoping that Treyvon does not see the gun and shoot him with it? I don't think so. Because human nature in the fight or flight to save oneself.

Political profile articles:

The Liberal Democrats & Hypocrisy

Politician Scandals and Affairs, From JFK to Barack Obama

Democrat Vice President Joe Biden Gaffes. VP of it

Writer- Victorio Valentino

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Mike Wallace, His Grand Career and Interview Style

Legendary News Man Mike(Myron) Wallace Passed Away from natural causes at 93 in 2012


When Mike Wallace wanted to know something he asked it.

 We have lost a news legend in 2012. Mike Wallace, whose inimitable style will not be forgotten. He passed away at age 93. In an age where many reporters seem to be genuinely concerned with themselves and how they will come across, Wallace seemed focused like a laser beam on the story. 

To see clips of Mike Wallace conduct an interview can be down right riveting. As a child watching 60 minutes, I was afraid of him. The camera would be so close up of interviewed's face displaying their discomfort while Mike asked his probing questions.

 I have since heard that Mike believed by doing this, the audience would see the truth. Even though I did not understand the interview, I recognized that Mike Wallace commanded respect, as many celebrities seemed genuinely intimidated by this man. There is no one like him today. He created interest by his serious and well researched questions, not because he was vulgar like wannabees, Bill Maher, who lacks the class and intelligence that is required for credibility and respect.

His son, however, Chris Wallace is an excellent reporter on the best and most trusted cable news channel, Fox News. With many of his father's greatest attributes, and bearing a close resemblance to Mike Wallace, he can be seen on Fox News Sunday delivering the news and and displaying a professional and intelligent persona that is quite a bit softer than is father's. Chris is intelligent, fair and trustworthy, but not frightening. Instead he is very approachable and extremely likable. There is no way to honestly dislike Chris Wallace.

Early Years/Myron Wallace

Mike Wallace was originally Myron Wallace, he was influenced in college to do public speeking and school newspapers, and planned on being a English Professor, but when he found his talent in speaking and writing, Mike Wallace immerged as an announcer, radio game show host of Information Please, in the 1930's. In the 1940's he was a staff announcer at the CBS radio network. During the 1950's he hosted a number of game shows, and even acted, before landing his big break with ABC's The Mike Wallace Interview. in 1968 he began 60 minutes, and then moved on to CBS. Mike Wallace did such a fine job of developing his serious interview style that it is difficult to imagine him doing anything else. He most definitely boosted the ratings of 60 minutes. Unfortunately, Mr. Wallace battled depression the last years of his life due to a scandal and lawsuit. He won a much deserved Emmy at age 89.

Best on Politics:

Left To Right, My Battle With Acute Liberalism

Why Not Tax the Rich & Redistribute Wealth


Democrat Hilary Rosen Waged War on Home Makers


About the Democratic Party

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Romney vs Ryan Debate 2 with Shill Moderator, Candy Crowley

The debate starts out civilized and calm, until the schill moderator, Candy Crowley interrupted Mitt Romney and allowed Obama to run on with a tremendous barrage of propaganda that he could not support by any facts. Governor Romney tried to defend his position and explain with facts when shill Candy stated that she needed to move on and would come back later.

Governor Romney had to get tough when Barack Obama resorted to Vice President Joe Biden's methods of lying and telling the crowd that Mitt Romney is the liar. Obama was well prepared with lies and manipulation, and would not answer questions directly. He then tried to instill fear in the hearts of Americans by insinuating that Romney's plan is somehow connected to the recession that we are living in right now.

Obama further put words in Mitt Romney's mouth in his attempt to brainwash the crowd into believing that these are in fact Mitt Romney's ideas.

Romney tried vainly to turn the debate into a fair presentation of both sides. It is truly un-democratic to have liberal moderators at all of the debates. This is reminiscent of the democratic convention having their "vote" on replacing god in their platform. The result had nothing to do with the question asked. The DNC had already decided to go ahead with it.

Romney tried on numerous occasions to explain the "facts" that democrats have been asking for, yet whenever he got a few good words out, the moderator cut him off and moved on to Obama. The president rambled stories and led the focus away from the failed economy and geared toward skin color.

It appeared that there was some kind of conspiracy between the moderator and Obama  to not let Romney speak.

Surprisingly, Obama would not shut up and heckles Romney as he tried to talk. The schill moderator at one point did say don't talk to each other back and fourth. Obama paid no attention to the request and went on making childish comments, interrupting Mitt Romney.

Romney sat respectfully while Obama looked right at him and told lies about what his own plan would be.

I had no intention of voting for Obama, but before this debate I thought Obama was a nice man, but a bad president, now I think he is the bottom of the barrel.

Read- The Mitt Romney They Don't Want You To Know About

Monday, October 15, 2012

Politicizing the Murders in Libya; The White House Lies

David Axelrod, and the democratic party are trying desperately to keep the public from focusing on the dishonesty of the Obama administration with regard to the murders of four Americans in Libya.

Mitt Romney

 Axelrod criticizes Mitt Romney for politicizing the Libya tragedy. The only thing David Axelrod has forgotten is that politics are always politicized, and his attempts to stop asking questions about the events leading up the the murders is the democrats way of politicizing the tragedy. 

Four years ago the American people were told to shut up and let the Obama administration push a stimulus package through without knowing what it was all about, and as a result, Americans still do not know what they agreed to pass. 

Now the democrats want Americans to leave Obama alone, and not question what is going on in his administration so that he can more easily be re-elected. 

 This time Americans must be inquisitive about what Obama and Hilary Clinton tried to cover up, and lot let themselves be bullied into silence by the Obama administration or the crooked democrats who will stop at nothing to keep pushing their party into the white house.

As obedient liberals write articles and spin stories about republicans and Mitt Romney, and how they should not be allowed to talk about this matter because it may hinder Obama's chances for re-election, it reminds me of the law they wanted to pass before Obama was first elected in 2008. 

There was such a powerful movement to push Obama into the white house, that liberals across the country were talking about passing a law that would make it illegal to say anything negative about Obama. 

This would not be the system of a free country.

David Axelrod and the democrats are again trying to push a Nazi -like movement toward the murders in Libya, and are sugar coating it with  "empathy for the families" of murdered Americans.

Sean Smith, Murdered in Libya
Axelrod stated that Christopher Stevens family does not wish for their sons death to be politicized, and Axelrod is now politicizing that statement for the gain of the Obama administration.

Sean Smith is also one of the murdered who's mother is furious with Obama and his shifty administration. She wants the democrats and the Obama administration to be held accountable for her sons murder, due to their lack of interest with regards to protecting Americans.

Honestly, the biggest white house scandal of all time is happening right now, and Americans are letting themselves be hushed by slick politicians such as Axelrod.  

Republican presidential challenger Mitt Romney and running mate Paul Ryan paid tribute to Stevens and fellow Americans Sean Smith, Glen A. Doherty and Tyrone S.

Fortunately Mitt Romney has the guts to speak up about what went on in Libya. The democrats are now spreading lies about Romney on a daily basis in effort to frighten him into ignoring the deaths of four Americans. But Governor Romney is proving himself to be a strong and moral man in many ways.  He is is compassionate and concerned for those who were so savagely murdered on September 12, 2012.

It is refreshing to know that Mitt Romney is the type of man who would do the right thing while in the white house. 

Months before he was murdered, Ambassador Stevens asked the white house for more security, and was ignored. 

Why was he ignored? 

Because Obama did not want an open scandal while he was campaigning for re-election.

It just doesn't get any more political than that.

Within 24 hours of the murders Hilary Clinton was on television stating that the murders of these four Americans was the fault of a guy who made a low budget movie that was negative towards Muslims, Period.

The Obama white house covered up the fact that this was a terrorist  attack and they are still trying to keep Americans in the dark by sending out toadies such as David Axelrod, to use a lot of fancy rhetoric and blame republicans for trying to get to the bottom of things. 

That's right- Obama lied, People died!

Its the oldest manipulation tactic in the world. -

"If you can't blame the victims, blame the people who are trying to expose the criminal."

I am confident that the American people can see through the white houses lies, and its verbal jiu jitsu. 

The democrats are politicizing the murders by brushing them under the rug.

Only the hard chore liberals, who will basically say, "yes master," to whatever the democratic party has to say, will fall for this democratic song and dance.

This is America and we need to demand that the white house tell us the truth!

Regardless of his campaign for re-election....

Read- The Mitt Romney They Don't Want You To Know About. 

Best Political Reading:

The Liberal Democrats & Hypocrisy

Left To Right, My Battle With Acute Liberalism



Sunday, October 14, 2012

Barack Obama Approval Rating, and Joe Biden

Barack Obama enjoyed a high approval rating when he first took office. 

Never before had a president had such a clean slate to work with. 

The media pumped him up in every way. 

Mitt Romney Barack Obama Debate

Even with some extremely negative attributes going against him, such as virtually no previous experience as a governor, and an obviously fudged up position as a Senator for several days that had been just a platform for his run for the Presidency, the general public ignored his shortcomings and welcomed him to the white house with the belief that he would surround himself with very knowledgeable people who would make up for his own shortcomings.

Obama supporters pointed to Joe Biden as prima facie evidence of his strong ability to make decisions and lead.

Joe Biden has been in politics since 1970, became Senator in 1972, and was re-elected six times. He had everything that Barack Obama was lacking in politics. A real history as a Senator, who served as county council, was chairman of  the Foreign Relations Committee. He also chaired the Judiciary Committee during the Supreme Court nominations of Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas. An impressive history indeed.

He also ran for the democratic presidential nominee in 1988, but ran into trouble due to a tremendous scandal in which he was found to be guilty of plagiarism on many levels.

He had made speeches that were written by other politicians and were used publicly in other countries. It was not difficult to pin down exactly where he had stolen his speeches. His blatant dishonesty was frowned upon during the 1980s, when Americans expected the truth.

Ronald Reagan had just been president and no matter what was happening in the Reagan white house, he told the American people the truth. Even at one point telling the country that he had made a mistake. All presidents make mistakes, but few admit it where thy went wrong and tell the American people.  America had been spoiled by Reagan, and was not about to settle on a guy would did not have what it takes to write his own speeches. Biden disappeared for a while, and George H. Bush was the next president of the United States. 

Joe Biden and Barack Obama

In 2008, Joe Biden was back with a vengance. He was seeking the presidency once again. He made an effort to run away with the democratic nomination up against Barack Obama, Hilary Clinton, Christopher Dodd, John Edwards,Mike Gravel, Dennis Kucinich, and Bill Richardson.

 Barack Obama was the nominee and Joe Biden would be his running mate, much to the delight of the democratic party.

Obama could be the smooth and likable guy for appearances and Joe could be the brains and experience. 

Shortly after the initial honeymoon with the liberal press, Obama and Biden began to show weakness in every way. 

Obama gave depressing speeches about the "Great Recession." His early speeches offered nothing in which Americans had been accustomed to.

The speeches were helpless, and negative, as opposed to upbeat, and with the attitude of pulling together to get out of the hole we were in. He was basically trying to condition the American people that he was not responsible for anything negative that was happening. He then famously blamed George Bush, the former Republican President for everything negative about jobs, real estate and the overall economy.

How long would the American people be willing to listen to this before they would make Obama start taking responsibility for his lack of actions.

Obama was soon receiving criticism for not taking the attitude that Ronald Reagan took the last time the country was in a recession, by rallying the country to prosperity with speeches of exceptionalism and tax cuts that would generate action.

The next four years presented little change as the country plodded along. 

Because Obama's campaign had been so powerful and so many people wanted to believe in him, he still had a high approval rating.

It was not until 2012 that those who were running out of unemployment benefits, students who who could not find jobs, and struggling families began taking a fresh look at the Obama administration.

Under the Obama administration long term unemployment doubled.
There were 2.6 million unemployed for more than 6 months when Obama took office, and by June of 2012, that number had soared more than 100 percent to 5.3 million.

On September 12, 2012 four Americans, including the American Ambassador to Libya were murdered in a terrorizing five hour attack. This was a terrorist attack that was in the works for several months.

The American ambassador, Christopher Stevens, had been asking for more security and stating that he was in fear for his life. The Obama white house ignored his requests due to not wanting to rock the boat during his own campaign for re-election.

Obama's white house made an effort to cover up the fact that America was the victim of another terrorist attack by reporting publicly that the reason four Americans were murdered is because an American made a 15 minute film that was negative toward Muslims. Hilary Clinton and President Obama both made a point of going on national television to tell the American public that this was not a terrorist attack, but an uprising due to the film being shown on youtube. 

It did not take long before the country discovered the truth and the white house began changing their story and stating that, "this could be the result of a terrorist attack."

 Even with negative job numbers, and a white house cover up, many Americans were not willing to totally give up on Obama until  the first debate between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama. 

President Obama's administration had been filled with the same repetitive rhetoric for over three years, and it had always resulted in no improvement as far as job creations go and promises of higher gas prices and higher taxes. Yet people trusted him because they liked the way he presented his speeches. He appeared confident and knowledgeable while reading a teleprompter.

In October 3, 2012 Governor Mitt Romney showed Obama what a leader looks like. Americans saw for the first time in years a true commander in chief.

Barack Obama was clearly outclassed as Mitt Romney, a man with exceptional experience in the private sector and as a Governor, debunked Obama's negative propaganda that Romney would raise taxes. Romney pointed out how he would lover taxes on the middle class to stimulate the economy, and create jobs. 

Obama began to look down and in the opposite direction of Mitt Romney, clearly lost without his teleprompter.

Mitt Romney, Presidential Material
For many it was a first real look at the President. His lack of interest, experience and organization were obvious.

Immediately after the debate, all the money Obama was spending on the negative ads were overshadowed by the performance by Mitt Romney, and the weak showing by President Obama. The common sense of the American people was starting to prevail.

Numerous energized voters with a new and upbeat attitude toward the country casting their vote for Romney, and expressing a renewed confidence in the country.

Friday, October 12, 2012

Obama Says We Need Bipartisanship

The Obama administration has stated throughout its term that, "we need bipartisanship."

Joe said get out of the way. Not lets work together.

Thursday, October 11, 2012

The Paul Ryan vs Joe Biden Debate

Just before the debate I heard liberal democrat Bob Beckel on The Five say that he thinks Paul Ryan is going to use too many facts, too many details and specifics because "he is prone to do that."  Beckel was correct in that Ryan did use specifics, but I was not offended by hearing specific facts. 

However, I was offended by Joe Biden's constant interruptions, shouting, and outright lies!

Strangely, the liberals, Bob Beckel included, have been saying that they have not heard enough details from republicans. Again, the liberals talk out of both sides of their mouths, and are never intellectually honest.

 As Joe Biden and Paul Ryan squared off for the debate, Ryan took his time to respectfully produce facts about the Romney/Ryan plan to fix America, while Joe Biden did little outside of play the liberal card of saying, "liar," when ever the facts were proving to make the Obama administration appear what it is. 
This formula seems to be the only thing the Obama/Biden ticket has to run on. Basically what ever the opponent says, they just simply counter with, "liar!", in the same manner that children do when met with an uncomfortable situation.

Joe Biden made every attempt to intimidate Paul Ryan by laughing, rolling his eyes, not directly answering the questions and trying to sway the audience into believing that Ryan is lying before Paul Ryan could even opened his mouth. 

Since the Obama administration has no real leg to stand on, Biden's strategy was to keep the audience from getting the opportunity to listen to Ryan give a level headed speech about the real issues, and he kept his own mouth going as much as possible, with the strategy to let the 90 minutes expire without the viewers ever really getting the chance to hear Paul Ryan speak.

Joe Biden was probably on his first set of teeth and getting his first facelift when Paul Ryan was born. 

He is 30 years Paul Ryan's senior, and although crazy Joe has been attached to numerous gaffs and embarrassing  failures by the Obama administration, he knows how to tell a lie with a straight face and draw listeners away from reality and into his barking, biting rants. 

Biden reminded me of Chris Matthews as he placed his prop smiled on his face intermittently between rambling, mindless stories that had nothing to do with the facts. Biden knows that the average person with no real comprehension of issues will believe that he is talking to them when he repeats things about poor people and shows distaste for the rich. 

Joe Biden is another limousine liberal who likes to talk as though he is a coal miner with an understanding of the poor. Most workers see this attitude as patronizing.

Joe Biden shouted, smirked, and said, "oh god" while Ryan make his points. 

The whole charade is obviously part of the democrats formula to hide their own ineptness and failures. 

Just keep calling Romney and Ryan liars, and maybe we will gain supporters by November.

The democrats ultimate hope is that people will be stupid enough to believe Biden's eye rolling and phony stories over the facts. 

One of the most important facts is that the economy is in the dumps and Obama said that if unemployment were to go above 8%; he has failed as a president and does not deserve to be re-elected. 

Twenty minutes into the debate Biden's childish, giggly and bullying tactics were getting pretty old, and even the simplest liberals were aware that Joe Biden had done it again; he had made a first class ass out of himself and the Obama administration.

Ryan did rise to the occasion by reminding Joe that "things don't always come out the way we want them to." Upon hearing this Biden did it again. He gaffed big time! He stated, "but I always say what I mean."

Really Joe? You thing J-O-B-S is a three letter word!

Really Joe? You want to raise taxes by a trillion dollars!

Well thank you for letting us know.

Ryan then pointed out that the Obama administration passed the stimulus and drove the country down deeper into the recession.  Biden interrupted, and unfortunately the moderator did not control the belligerent Biden, who made a point of telling viewers to go to his website to read what he has to say.

At one point Biden turned his school yard bullying on the female moderator, pointing his finger and attempting to intimidate her into backing off the Obama administration.

As poorly as Obama did in his debate with Romney, I think Biden did even worse against Ryan. I do also believe that he will not be viewed by the general public as having done as poorly because simply, a big gas bag comes across with at least more confidence  than one who looks down and can't make eye contact. 
But ultimately do we want to continue  having a big wind bag in the white house? Barking patronizing stories about being poor, while the middle class continues to dwindle under the Obama administration.

Romney's Decisive Win Over President Obama

What will the liberal media on CNN and MSNBC say about the Ryan/Biden debate?

After Mitt Romney KO'd President Barack Obama decisively in their first debate on October 3, 2012, the liberal media went into a frenzy in effort to somehow make Obama look bigger than Mitt Romney. 

They had their work cut out for them.

Even extremely biased left wingers from CNN such as Soledad O'Brien, who was caught having her crew feed her data from Wikipedia while arguing with a conservative, have been caught in a moment of total honesty about the fact that Romney won decisively. 

O'Brien criticized Obama's weak performance and admitted that Romney was indeed the winner.
Soledad O'Brien is best known for her attempts to appear as though she knew "facts" that her conservative interviewee's did not. She had the CNN crew looking up information on Wikipedia and talking to her through her earpiece as she spoke in a sarcastic tone to her guests. 

Her voice was slow and mechanical as it would be in the event of listening through her earpiece and talking at the same time. some time later the whole thing was displayed on youtube, embarrassing O'Brien who had been smirking throughout her "debate" with conservative guests.

O'Brien has shown herself to be shamelessly supportive of Obama, no matter what he does, in the past.
The current alarming Libya cover up by the Obama administration has Soledad changing the subject and talking about big bird as often as possible when asked what she thinks of the total dishonesty of the Obama administration. 

Mitt Romney's superior debate performance has had such an impact on the liberals that some of them are afraid of looking foolish and flat out lying by stating that Obama won. Even the stubborn, left-wing nut job, Chris Matthews admitted the facts shortly after Romney's clear win over Obama.

 However, the truth couldn't last long.

The liberal press and the Obama administration have decided that the only chance Obama has is to say that Romney lied throughout the debate.

Its a weak argument, but among the extremely young and the not too terribly bright, it could influence some people, and it is the democrats only chance.

The fact is that if Romney were lying it should have been extra easy to dismantle him with the truth. Especially if one is the Commander in Chief. 

The democrats stated that Obama was just befuddled by it all.

Really? After his tough campaign four years ago, his four years in office, his current campaign, and the numerous press conferences, he is turned upside down by a man looking him in the eye, (not the sign of a liar), and talking about what needs to be done for the country? Poor little guy!

There were many un-truths told by Obama that have been backed up by video and audio evidence since the Romney/Obama standoff.   That reality combined with the fact that Obama often looked down, or in the opposite direction of Mitt Romney during much of the debate tells the whole story.

Romney is the best choice for president and it is obvious to any moderately educated and intellectually honest person. The democrats are grasping at straws in their hope to find enough dimwitted people who will listen to stories about what happened at the debate rather than watch it, and draw their opinions on facts.

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

The Administration of Lies

What caused the 9/11 tragedy?

When dissecting the whole matter it becomes clear that the ultimate responsibility lies at the doorstep of Bill Clinton. 

During Clinton's presidency al-Qaeda attacked the U. S. Navel Ship, The USS Coal on October 12, 2000, killing 17 American sailors and injuring 39.

Then president Bill Clinton made no military response. Therefore encouraging al-Qaeda. 

Going back even further. 
February 26, 1993 a truck bomb went off in the North Tower of The World Trade Center Tower. This was immediately after Clinton took office, and he said, "we will pursue this", but he proved to be all talk and no action. 

This led to the bombing in 2000 of the U.S. Embassy of both Kenya and Tanzania. 

Bill Clinton's strategy throughout these terrorist attacks was to deflect any attention away from himself.

During that time al-Qaeda had been planning the second attack on the World Trade Center. With such a weak response to the previous attacks the momentum was in full swing, and al-Qaeda was becoming bolder and viewing the U.S. as a "paper tiger."

After the 9/11 attacks Bill Clinton spoke out on the news that there were 1000 hours of al-Quaeda phone conversations that had never been translated. His immediate response was to try to blame George W. Bush, however, those 1000 hours were collected during HIS presidency and they were NEVER translated. 

Because of Bill Clinton's lack luster response, 9/11 was a total devastation. 

At this point after four years of Obama on one side of his mouth he is going after al-Quaeda like gang busters, and from the other side he is appologizing and not wanting to blame the current attacks on terrorism. 

The most recent attack in which the Ambassador and three other Americans were killed was blamed on a movie maker.

Ambassador Christopher Stevens had been asking for more security and it was refused. If this is proven to be accurate, the death of the Ambassador and three others rests at the doorstep of Hilary Clinton for refusing protection.

Why did they refuse to protect?

Because they did not want to create a combative impression.

LeVar Burton Wants Tax Payers to Fork Over $450 million to PBS

 LeVar Burton says that PBS provides quality programming at "no cost to the public." He was informed that PBS costs the public $450 million dollars per year.

LeVar Burton- Has No Clue
I am sure that LeVar is one who thinks that multimillion dollar corporations should be paying their fair share in taxes, yet he believe PBS should get tax subsides from we the people! 

When cornered, LeVar said that Nickelodeon and "Big Bird" will survive without the millions.

Liberal hypocrisy is at work again. 

$450 million dollars per year!   ......Yet, LeVar was under the impression it was at no cost to the public. It goes to prove that he does not know what he is talking about, and has no clue where the money comes from.

Nickelodeon does not have the subsides of PBS and it does do just fine without taking taxpayer money.

We need to cut spending. That is a fact! 

The country is in trouble and frivolous spending needs to be taken under control. Mitt Romney,  Business man, and Governor knows where those cuts need to be made, and LeVar, having lived high on the hog for many decades in show business, just can not understand the concept of cutbacks.

On a small scale we may think that an expensive educational game for our children is a good thing, but if it puts us in debt $100,000 that we do not have, then it was really not a wise move. The primary goal of the country is to get back on its feet by making cuts to protect the children of the future from our mindless spending. Its not rocket science.

 LeVar thinks that pulling $450 million out of PBS,  education will crumble. 
If we continue to pour $450 million on fluff, the country will certainly crumble.  LeVar Burton went spastic after being pressed on the subject. "Its about the kids", he said. 
The old stand by when celebrities and politicians want to appear philanthropic they say,  "its for the kids!"

Honestly, the kids will thank us for not spending $450 million on PBS that they are not watching, and sparing them the inevitable debt the kids are going to have to pay back in their future!