Racist; Democrats or Republicans?

The Freedom Examiner is a compilation of writers who wish to express their own views that lay outside of the main stream. That is not to say that we don't agree with many issues that are presented by the media, but there are so many times these days when the news puts a slant on a story that is totally inaccurate or fuel charged in effort to get people charged up and angry. The discerning minded will not be part of the crowd all the time and in some cases, will never totally run with the group. Especially, with politics.

Personally, I learned to think more conservatively after spending time in Cuba and parts of Europe that were socialist. I thoroughly learned through experience that what the liberals are trying to do is bad for ALL American citizens. I also learned that in democratic states liberals hate conservatives with a mindless fanaticism that actually led me to never admit any of my conservative views because I just knew I would be called a lot of names that had nothing to do with my view points. Such as wanting low taxes, being allowed to carry weapons for protection, and for appreciating freedom to succeed. 

The typical liberal won't directly address those pretty typical conservative issues, instead they call us racist, when in fact our party was the anti slavery party that stopped black people from being treated as second class citizens, and talk a lot of nonsense that have nothing to do with what is really happening.

I decided that the liberal propaganda was so out of control that I began to speak about issues much to the surprise of many of my friends, that were not in line with liberal propaganda.  They were liberals and were therefore taught by MSNBC,  CNN or some other liberal media, that we are racist, and that is basically all its about.  The problem for my friends is they know I am not racist because they have been with me under every circumstance possible and they know without a doubt that I am anything but a racist. But they were so sure that being conservative means racism, that they had trouble being open minded towards something that they had been hit on the head with for so long.  After explaining that they have been duped into believing this by all the constant badgering by liberal shills, I proved it to them through introducing them to conservatives of all races and even taking them to a tea party, which they were surprised to discover was not even republican, but a mix of all political parties and all races. MSNBC and CNN deliberately only film the white people and will hunt out anyone who appears mad or intoxicated to display to their viewers as white racist and hateful people.

My friends have learned to at least question the way the main stream media presents republicans, and one girl in particular even said that she is starting to see that republicans are unfairly represented on television in every way. 

Had I never come out and talked about things, these people would not have seen the truth.  I endure abuse from angry liberals because I believe its worth it when at least one liberal learns that being republican means to have a passion for freedom, not a desire to act the way the democrats did in the 1860's and have black people picking cotton again.

Who is racist, Republicans or Democrats?

Clearly the democrats are racist if we have to choose one.  I do not even have to go back to the 1800s to come to this conclusion. I just received a name calling, and very ignorant email from a liberal today who called a writer here at The Freedom Examiner a racist because he wrote an article stating outrage over Obama politicizing the Connecticut shooting. 

This writer signed himself as "anonymous" of course. But in his writing it was clear that he misunderstood the article, believing that it said, "this shooting is Obama's fault." 

When a group of people are so blind as to freak out when they read something negative about "their guy" , we are in real trouble. One of the ironic things in the email was that it accused Mario De La Huerta to be a white racist, when he is Mexican and has African American relatives. Wrong again liberal!

One of my favorite things about the display of mindlessness was that he stood on a high horse saying that speaking in a critical way is "hateful" and "disgusting to say about a president." 

Although he signed himself anonymous, he used the same language on the Independent Politics Post blog a few minutes later and left a link to his blog which was a collage of curse words about George Bush and aggressive hate speech about Mitt Romney. Nothing that had any truth tied to it, just a bunch of name calling filth. His high horse about saying anything negative about a president went out the window when George Bush's name was linked to a string of racist and hateful curse words, and nothing more.

Again, many liberals have swallowed the Kool Aid without thought. They have been trained to shout, "Racist" at anything that upsets their agenda. Its not only wrong, and racist itself, but it takes meaning away from real racism. Come on Obama supporters, Lay off the Kool Aid and open your mind!

 
KH

Obama Lied, People Died

To vote for Obama is to vote against the American people. 

The biggest white house scandal of all time is unfolding right now, and the main stream media is ignoring it.

Both CNN and MSNBC, among others, have backed Obama for more than four years and coming out with the facts about the Obama administration at this point would make all of them look foolish, and as a result, they are talking about nonsense and ignoring Benghazi, which makes them part of the white house scandal and the shady cover up. 

 This massive coverup  starts at the white house and extends through the media. ABC News is ignoring emails regarding the Libya scandal, while CNN is trying to spread a fear that some politicians may believe that everyone should be responsible for their own birth control. Meanwhile the families of the dead are left with questions.

On September 11, 2012 the American Embassy was attacked by terrorists. The white house was watching the entire scenario unfold in real time. The Navy Seals who were on the ground at the time of the uprising asked the the white house for orders to go in and protect, and were told to "stand down". This scenario was repeated three times when finally the Seals decided to ignore the orders and to ahead with a rescue attempt. Sadly the lives of Tyrone Woods, Glen Doherty, and Sean Smith along with Ambassador Stevens were all lost.

 Charles Woods, father of Tyrone Woods, has come out to tell the story of his son the Navy Seal who was killed in Libya. Charles spoke to President Obama and Hilary Clinton when his sons body was brought back. Obama said I am sorry in a quick and cold manner that did nothing to put the family at rest.  Mr. Woods could also tell that president Obama was agitated by the whole situation as well as Hilary Clinton. Hilary actually said that "we are going to arrest the person who made that film." Charles knew that this was a lie. He knew this tragedy was not the result of a video and he knew that his sons death was the result of the men rioting in Libya, not the result of an American playing with a camera.

Obama Picture & American flag being burned in Afganistan

Charles later discovered that the president watched his son being murdered in real time and did nothing. The heroic efforts of his son along with the fact that he was an honest man, puts Charles at ease today. But, he will always have disgust for the pettiness of the Obama administration, and their coldness toward the heroic Navy Seals.

After immediately telling the American public that this attack on the American Embassy and the deaths of four Americans was the result of someone making a silly anti Muslim film and posting it to youtube, the Obama administration looks pretty fishy. Yet, they are not being pressed to tell the truth.

On October 27th President Obama declined to answer directly whether a CIA annex was denied urgent requests for military assistance during the deadly attacks last month on U.S. outposts in Libya.

Why did Obama lie? 

The economy has not really budged  since Obama has taken office, and gas prices are at an all time high. Before Obama was elected president, he said that he would get the economy thriving and decrease gas prices. Having failed at both of these major points, Obama was planning on running his campaign for a second term on telling the American public that there have been no terrorist attacks since he has been in office. This is believed to be why he threw four Americans under the bus. He wanted to get re-elected at all costs.

The terrorism and anti Americanism world wide has not changed and never will. America needs to feel comfortable with just being America and stop trying to gain the affection of the whole world.

Libya 9-11-2012

 The photo on the right shows Benghazi at the height of the attack. Ambassador Stevens died of smoke inhalation, and Tyrone woods was found slumped over his his gun. He fired his weapon in an effort to save the lives of Americans who were being attacked and was murdered while bravely standing at his post.

The Obama campaign did not let up. The president has been seen on a number of talk shows gracing over the terrorist attack and talking about light hearted issues.

This is how he was elected the first time. Talking about music, dance moves and fun things that encourage people to like him. The families of the dead are not laughing along with the president. They want to face the truth, and they want this white house to come clean regardless of the campaign.

Obama on a talk show weeks after the terrorist attack.

Great political articles: Left to Right, My Battle with Acute Liberalism

                                  

                      The Mitt Romney They Don't Want You to Know About



                                   Why Not Tax the Rich & Redistribute Wealth 



Writer-Mario De La Huerta

Politicizing the Murders in Libya; The White House Lies

David Axelrod, and the democratic party are trying desperately to keep the public from focusing on the dishonesty of the Obama administration with regard to the murders of four Americans in Libya.

Mitt Romney

 Axelrod criticizes Mitt Romney for politicizing the Libya tragedy. The only thing David Axelrod has forgotten is that politics are always politicized, and his attempts to stop asking questions about the events leading up the the murders is the democrats way of politicizing the tragedy. 

Four years ago the American people were told to shut up and let the Obama administration push a stimulus package through without knowing what it was all about, and as a result, Americans still do not know what they agreed to pass. 

Now the democrats want Americans to leave Obama alone, and not question what is going on in his administration so that he can more easily be re-elected. 

 This time Americans must be inquisitive about what Obama and Hilary Clinton tried to cover up, and lot let themselves be bullied into silence by the Obama administration or the crooked democrats who will stop at nothing to keep pushing their party into the white house.

As obedient liberals write articles and spin stories about republicans and Mitt Romney, and how they should not be allowed to talk about this matter because it may hinder Obama's chances for re-election, it reminds me of the law they wanted to pass before Obama was first elected in 2008. 

There was such a powerful movement to push Obama into the white house, that liberals across the country were talking about passing a law that would make it illegal to say anything negative about Obama. 

This would not be the system of a free country.

David Axelrod and the democrats are again trying to push a Nazi -like movement toward the murders in Libya, and are sugar coating it with  "empathy for the families" of murdered Americans.

Sean Smith, Murdered in Libya

Axelrod stated that Christopher Stevens family does not wish for their sons death to be politicized, and Axelrod is now politicizing that statement for the gain of the Obama administration.

Sean Smith is also one of the murdered who's mother is furious with Obama and his shifty administration. She wants the democrats and the Obama administration to be held accountable for her sons murder, due to their lack of interest with regards to protecting Americans.

Honestly, the biggest white house scandal of all time is happening right now, and Americans are letting themselves be hushed by slick politicians such as Axelrod.  

Republican presidential challenger Mitt Romney and running mate Paul Ryan paid tribute to Stevens and fellow Americans Sean Smith, Glen A. Doherty and Tyrone S.

Fortunately Mitt Romney has the guts to speak up about what went on in Libya. The democrats are now spreading lies about Romney on a daily basis in effort to frighten him into ignoring the deaths of four Americans. But Governor Romney is proving himself to be a strong and moral man in many ways.  He is is compassionate and concerned for those who were so savagely murdered on September 12, 2012.

It is refreshing to know that Mitt Romney is the type of man who would do the right thing while in the white house. 

Months before he was murdered, Ambassador Stevens asked the white house for more security, and was ignored. 

Why was he ignored? 

Because Obama did not want an open scandal while he was campaigning for re-election.

It just doesn't get any more political than that.

Within 24 hours of the murders Hilary Clinton was on television stating that the murders of these four Americans was the fault of a guy who made a low budget movie that was negative towards Muslims, Period.

The Obama white house covered up the fact that this was a terrorist  attack and they are still trying to keep Americans in the dark by sending out toadies such as David Axelrod, to use a lot of fancy rhetoric and blame republicans for trying to get to the bottom of things. 

That's right- Obama lied, People died!

Its the oldest manipulation tactic in the world. -

"If you can't blame the victims, blame the people who are trying to expose the criminal."

I am confident that the American people can see through the white houses lies, and its verbal jiu jitsu. 

The democrats are politicizing the murders by brushing them under the rug.

Only the hard chore liberals, who will basically say, "yes master," to whatever the democratic party has to say, will fall for this democratic song and dance.

This is America and we need to demand that the white house tell us the truth!

Regardless of his campaign for re-election....

Read- The Mitt Romney They Don't Want You To Know About. 

Best Political Reading:

 Why Not Tax the Rich & Redistribute Wealth

The Liberal Democrats & Hypocrisy

Left To Right, My Battle With Acute Liberalism

 

 

The Paul Ryan vs Joe Biden Debate

Just before the debate I heard liberal democrat Bob Beckel on The Five say that he thinks Paul Ryan is going to use too many facts, too many details and specifics because "he is prone to do that."  Beckel was correct in that Ryan did use specifics, but I was not offended by hearing specific facts. 

However, I was offended by Joe Biden's constant interruptions, shouting, and outright lies!

Strangely, the liberals, Bob Beckel included, have been saying that they have not heard enough details from republicans. Again, the liberals talk out of both sides of their mouths, and are never intellectually honest.

 As Joe Biden and Paul Ryan squared off for the debate, Ryan took his time to respectfully produce facts about the Romney/Ryan plan to fix America, while Joe Biden did little outside of play the liberal card of saying, "liar," when ever the facts were proving to make the Obama administration appear what it is. 

This formula seems to be the only thing the Obama/Biden ticket has to run on. Basically what ever the opponent says, they just simply counter with, "liar!", in the same manner that children do when met with an uncomfortable situation.

Joe Biden made every attempt to intimidate Paul Ryan by laughing, rolling his eyes, not directly answering the questions and trying to sway the audience into believing that Ryan is lying before Paul Ryan could even opened his mouth. 

Since the Obama administration has no real leg to stand on, Biden's strategy was to keep the audience from getting the opportunity to listen to Ryan give a level headed speech about the real issues, and he kept his own mouth going as much as possible, with the strategy to let the 90 minutes expire without the viewers ever really getting the chance to hear Paul Ryan speak.

Joe Biden was probably on his first set of teeth and getting his first facelift when Paul Ryan was born. 

He is 30 years Paul Ryan's senior, and although crazy Joe has been attached to numerous gaffs and embarrassing  failures by the Obama administration, he knows how to tell a lie with a straight face and draw listeners away from reality and into his barking, biting rants. 

Biden reminded me of Chris Matthews as he placed his prop smiled on his face intermittently between rambling, mindless stories that had nothing to do with the facts. Biden knows that the average person with no real comprehension of issues will believe that he is talking to them when he repeats things about poor people and shows distaste for the rich. 

Joe Biden is another limousine liberal who likes to talk as though he is a coal miner with an understanding of the poor. Most workers see this attitude as patronizing.

Joe Biden shouted, smirked, and said, "oh god" while Ryan make his points. 

The whole charade is obviously part of the democrats formula to hide their own ineptness and failures. 

Just keep calling Romney and Ryan liars, and maybe we will gain supporters by November.

The democrats ultimate hope is that people will be stupid enough to believe Biden's eye rolling and phony stories over the facts. 

One of the most important facts is that the economy is in the dumps and Obama said that if unemployment were to go above 8%; he has failed as a president and does not deserve to be re-elected. 

Twenty minutes into the debate Biden's childish, giggly and bullying tactics were getting pretty old, and even the simplest liberals were aware that Joe Biden had done it again; he had made a first class ass out of himself and the Obama administration.

Ryan did rise to the occasion by reminding Joe that "things don't always come out the way we want them to." Upon hearing this Biden did it again. He gaffed big time! He stated, "but I always say what I mean."

Really Joe? You thing J-O-B-S is a three letter word!

Really Joe? You want to raise taxes by a trillion dollars!

Well thank you for letting us know.

Ryan then pointed out that the Obama administration passed the stimulus and drove the country down deeper into the recession.  Biden interrupted, and unfortunately the moderator did not control the belligerent Biden, who made a point of telling viewers to go to his website to read what he has to say.

At one point Biden turned his school yard bullying on the female moderator, pointing his finger and attempting to intimidate her into backing off the Obama administration.

As poorly as Obama did in his debate with Romney, I think Biden did even worse against Ryan. I do also believe that he will not be viewed by the general public as having done as poorly because simply, a big gas bag comes across with at least more confidence  than one who looks down and can't make eye contact. 

But ultimately do we want to continue  having a big wind bag in the white house? Barking patronizing stories about being poor, while the middle class continues to dwindle under the Obama administration.

Romney's Decisive Win Over President Obama

What will the liberal media on CNN and MSNBC say about the Ryan/Biden debate?

After Mitt Romney KO'd President Barack Obama decisively in their first debate on October 3, 2012, the liberal media went into a frenzy in effort to somehow make Obama look bigger than Mitt Romney. 

They had their work cut out for them.

Even extremely biased left wingers from CNN such as Soledad O'Brien, who was caught having her crew feed her data from Wikipedia while arguing with a conservative, have been caught in a moment of total honesty about the fact that Romney won decisively. 

O'Brien criticized Obama's weak performance and admitted that Romney was indeed the winner.

Soledad O'Brien is best known for her attempts to appear as though she knew "facts" that her conservative interviewee's did not. She had the CNN crew looking up information on Wikipedia and talking to her through her earpiece as she spoke in a sarcastic tone to her guests. 

Her voice was slow and mechanical as it would be in the event of listening through her earpiece and talking at the same time. some time later the whole thing was displayed on youtube, embarrassing O'Brien who had been smirking throughout her "debate" with conservative guests.

O'Brien has shown herself to be shamelessly supportive of Obama, no matter what he does, in the past.

The current alarming Libya cover up by the Obama administration has Soledad changing the subject and talking about big bird as often as possible when asked what she thinks of the total dishonesty of the Obama administration. 

Mitt Romney's superior debate performance has had such an impact on the liberals that some of them are afraid of looking foolish and flat out lying by stating that Obama won. Even the stubborn, left-wing nut job, Chris Matthews admitted the facts shortly after Romney's clear win over Obama.

 However, the truth couldn't last long.

The liberal press and the Obama administration have decided that the only chance Obama has is to say that Romney lied throughout the debate.

Its a weak argument, but among the extremely young and the not too terribly bright, it could influence some people, and it is the democrats only chance.

The fact is that if Romney were lying it should have been extra easy to dismantle him with the truth. Especially if one is the Commander in Chief. 

The democrats stated that Obama was just befuddled by it all.

Really? After his tough campaign four years ago, his four years in office, his current campaign, and the numerous press conferences, he is turned upside down by a man looking him in the eye, (not the sign of a liar), and talking about what needs to be done for the country? Poor little guy!

There were many un-truths told by Obama that have been backed up by video and audio evidence since the Romney/Obama standoff.   That reality combined with the fact that Obama often looked down, or in the opposite direction of Mitt Romney during much of the debate tells the whole story.

Romney is the best choice for president and it is obvious to any moderately educated and intellectually honest person. The democrats are grasping at straws in their hope to find enough dimwitted people who will listen to stories about what happened at the debate rather than watch it, and draw their opinions on facts.

The Administration of Lies

What caused the 9/11 tragedy?

When dissecting the whole matter it becomes clear that the ultimate responsibility lies at the doorstep of Bill Clinton. 

During Clinton's presidency al-Qaeda attacked the U. S. Navel Ship, The USS Coal on October 12, 2000, killing 17 American sailors and injuring 39.

Then president Bill Clinton made no military response. Therefore encouraging al-Qaeda. 

Going back even further. 

February 26, 1993 a truck bomb went off in the North Tower of The World Trade Center Tower. This was immediately after Clinton took office, and he said, "we will pursue this", but he proved to be all talk and no action. 

This led to the bombing in 2000 of the U.S. Embassy of both Kenya and Tanzania. 

Bill Clinton's strategy throughout these terrorist attacks was to deflect any attention away from himself.

During that time al-Qaeda had been planning the second attack on the World Trade Center. With such a weak response to the previous attacks the momentum was in full swing, and al-Qaeda was becoming bolder and viewing the U.S. as a "paper tiger."

After the 9/11 attacks Bill Clinton spoke out on the news that there were 1000 hours of al-Quaeda phone conversations that had never been translated. His immediate response was to try to blame George W. Bush, however, those 1000 hours were collected during HIS presidency and they were NEVER translated. 

Because of Bill Clinton's lack luster response, 9/11 was a total devastation. 

At this point after four years of Obama on one side of his mouth he is going after al-Quaeda like gang busters, and from the other side he is appologizing and not wanting to blame the current attacks on terrorism. 

The most recent attack in which the Ambassador and three other Americans were killed was blamed on a movie maker.



Ambassador Christopher Stevens had been asking for more security and it was refused. If this is proven to be accurate, the death of the Ambassador and three others rests at the doorstep of Hilary Clinton for refusing protection.

Why did they refuse to protect?

Because they did not want to create a combative impression.

Liberals Blame Movie For American Deaths

 Instead of blaming those Responsible for committing the murders. An Film Maker is to blame for Four Murders That Took Place in Another Country.

 CAIRO — Islamist militants armed with antiaircraft weapons and rocket-propelled grenades stormed a defenseless United States diplomatic mission in Libya, Sept 12,  killing the American ambassador and three members of his staff and raising questions about the radicalization of countries swept up in the Arab Spring.

The ambassador, Christopher Stevens, was missing almost immediately after the start of an intense, four-hour firefight for control of the mission, and his body was not located until Wednesday morning at dawn, when he was found dead at a Benghazi hospital, American and Libyan officials said. It was the first time since 1979 that an American ambassador had died in a violent assault. 

American and European officials said that while many details about the attack remained unclear, the assailants seemed organized, well trained and heavily armed, and they appeared to have at least some level of advance planning.  But the officials cautioned that it was too soon to tell whether the attack was related to the anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks. 

Sadly, the liberal media is not being honest and realistic withe the American public and have resorted to blaming a video posted online in the United States over two months ago.

Obama announced, "well, we've had a bad week," before a gathering shortly after learning of the Americans who were killed in this violent attack. He also gave a few "shout outs" before reminding the cheering crowd that there is going to be an election in 8 weeks. This president has stooped to a new low, along with Hilary Clinton and her talk of disgust for the Anti-Islam movie, without any disgust for the murders of Americans. The democrats have cow towed to Muslims to the point of accepting the murders of Americans in order not to offend Islam.

The focal point now is making the cast and crew members apologize for the film.

I may be old fashioned, but I believe that regardless of who criticizes your in a movie, you do not have the right to go out and kill innocent people.  I guess the democrats believe that murder is okay, provided you are Muslim and are insulted by something someone has said or done about your faith.  I know that if Christians began murdering innocent people in the street because MSNBC was criticizing Christianity, it would not be accepted. Muslims now believe that they can get away with murder because they know that the democratic party is desperate to get votes from American Muslims and will do what ever they can to make Muslims feel that they have power under a democratic majority.

As the democrats use this tragedy for political purposes; CNN has tried to pin it somehow to Mitt Romney, and Obama spoke out about the tragedy just so that he could get a few plugs for himself in the upcoming election.

Liberal Logic strikes again.

The Narrow Minded Attack on Corporations

The big corporations that everyone wants to hate because they outsource to China. Blame the corporations.

Many things need to be factored in to understand why this is happening.

So many Americans who do not have a sense of how Corporate America works often fall into the over simplistic platitudes of the liberal talking heads.... And they are as wrong as wrong can be.

To explain why outsourcing to China has been so advantageous to so many American Corporations, you first have to look at the factors that made the oversees jaunt worth it. (Trust me, outsourcing is a huge pain in the neck) Unions, senseless regulations and horrible trade agreements have made it nearly impossible to sustain a business without outsourcing. I know this from direct experience.

If I make a widget here and price it at $100, then put it on the shelf next to another company's widget that is only $75 because they import or export the manufacturing or fabrication... which one is the consumer going to buy?  Answer: the other guy's because it is $25 cheaper.

It amazes me how many complain about "corporate America," as if outsourcing is their direct fault. They do not realize the government's hand in it all--and spending their money without any consideration of how or where and their buying was made.

We must have some very "conservative" moves that many liberal progressive utopians can't stomach in order to turn it around.

I worked  for Boeing in finance at various levels for 43 years and am now basing my comment on my experience which is extensive. Unless you have actually witnessed unions in action, which I have, you have no idea how detrimental they can be to a company.


Now that corporation is moving some of it's business to right to work states like South Carolina and what happened. NLRB and Obama's justice Dept (or lack there of) sue the corporation and the state because the whining unions in Washington State had a fit. Last time I checked we still work under the free enterprise system but not according to Holder and the rest of those imposters.

Enrique Hernandez